On October 29, 2024, the government announced to introduce legislation related to charities that offer pregnancy options counselling. In a outlining their plans, ministers used language that disparaged and mischaracterized pregnancy care centres as deceptive. The EFC is concerned about the mischaracterization and targeting of and the politicization of charities.
In a
ministerial mandate letter released on December 16, 2021, the prime minister instructed the finance minister to: “Introduce amendments to the
Income Tax Act to make anti-abortion organizations that provide dishonest counselling to pregnant women about their rights and options ineligible for charitable status.”
The EFC is very concerned that these measures are only directed at organizations with a particular view on abortion. It raises the idea that participation in the public square and a level playing field with respect to government programs could be subject to a values test.
This raises questions as to whether the government intends to single out organizations with particular beliefs about when life begins, subjecting them to greater scrutiny, and possibly penalizing them for these beliefs. How will the government define and identify “dishonest counseling”? If a determination of “dishonest counseling” is based solely on a particular premise of when life begins or disagreement with abortion/ending life, this would raise serious concerns about compliance with the
Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
The EFC believes all charities should carry out their activities honestly and ethically, with integrity.
We are concerned, however, that organizations may be singled out simply because they hold particular underlying beliefs about when life begins, contrary to
Charter protections of religion, conscience, belief and expression.
Related resources